When a person wishes to raise a legal complaint, or seek damages, the first person they seek out is a lawyer. Many times the person who needs advice cannot afford a lawyer, so will seek legal advice online instead. One of the dangers there is that the advice might not fit, may be for a different country and may even be completely wrong.
I have studied law from a well known law college of the country. I am well aware of the various law terminologies. I worked with an established law firm for about 4 years. I am now a proficient attorney who can handle all types of tvistemål. I possess a Bachelor’s degree in Criminal Justice. This really provides me an edge over other candidates.
One woman’s tale of woe especially comes to mind. Around the office, we call her story “The Tale of the Nine Year Divorce.” She had hired an attorney to defend a divorce action here in Virginia and to counter sue for divorce. She was living out of state at the time and paid the attorney a significant retainer. There was no written contract. The lawyer she had chosen seemed to be afraid of the opposing counsel and did nothing to move the case forward. In fact, the lawyer allowed the case to be dismissed from the court docket for inaction.
For the area of expertise, you would want to have a family law expert on your side. If your divorce lawyer is an expert on family law, he / she will be able to defend your case thoroughly. He / she will be able to guide you with regards to child custody, child support, and alimony issues. After you have established your lawyer’s expertise in this area, determine his years of practice in this area. Ask the lawyer to talk about the last divorce case he represented. Years of experience are really very important alongside with the area of expertise. If the lawyer has only practiced family law for a year, you may have doubts just then. You’ll feel safer with a divorce lawyer who’s had years of experience in his belt.
Once discovery comes to a close, the defendant will often file something known as a motion for summary judgment. A summary judgment motion is simply an argument by the defendant that the evidence provided by the plaintiff in the case does not support a claim against the defendant. In moving for summary judgment, the court considers the law on the books and the evidence provided by the plaintiff. It views the evidence in a light most favorable to the plaintiff before making the decision. If the court finds in favor of the defendant, the lawsuit is over. At this point, the plaintiff can either abandon the lawsuit or file an appeal to have a higher court review the matter.
A case always is different from another, even though the may seem to be very similar. But the lawyer’s attack on the defense is usually the same. They just change tactics slightly, depending on the merits of the case. A lawyer that has handled a case similar to yours before is a good option because he, more or less, knows how the entire proceeding will head to.
Finally, don’t be hard on yourself after conducting this type of an interview. Not every question will be presented in the best way and you may have problems later deciphering some of your notes or recalling what was exactly said.